Performance has become the defining battleground in Ekiti State politics after ADC governorship candidate Dare Bejide launched one of his strongest criticisms yet against Governor Biodun Oyebanji’s administration, describing it as the worst in terms of performance. The remarks have intensified political debate across the state, with supporters and critics now locked in a contest over who best represents the realities faced by ordinary residents. As accusations and counterarguments fly, the larger question remains whether public perception will align with political rhetoric or with measurable government achievements.
Governance on Trial as Opposition Candidate Attacks Governor’s Record
Dare Bejide argued that Ekiti residents continue to face serious challenges despite years of promises and public investment. Speaking from the perspective of someone who has witnessed the state’s political evolution since its creation in 1996 and democratic administration from 1999 onward, he claimed that roads remain in poor condition, access to water and electricity remains inadequate in several areas, and insecurity continues to generate anxiety among citizens. He further alleged that kidnapping incidents have exposed weaknesses in public safety efforts and questioned whether the administration deserves another term based on its record.
The Governance criticism was accompanied by claims that communities affected by insecurity have not received sufficient attention from political leaders. Bejide contrasted his own visits to affected areas with what he described as limited official engagement. However, his comments represent a political assessment made within the context of electoral competition and should be viewed as campaign criticism rather than independently verified findings. Like many opposition figures, he is attempting to persuade voters that current conditions justify a change in leadership.
Re-Election Questioned as Bejide Declares Governor’s Performance the Worst
The broader Performance debate comes at a time when security and infrastructure have become major political issues across Nigeria. Several states continue to face challenges ranging from kidnapping and rural banditry to funding gaps for roads, water projects and electricity-related infrastructure. As a result, governors increasingly find themselves judged not only by completed projects but also by how effectively they respond to public concerns about safety and living standards.
Supporters of the Oyebanji administration have previously pointed to road projects, agricultural initiatives, education investments and efforts to attract development opportunities as evidence of progress. Political analysts note that such disagreements are common in election cycles, with incumbents highlighting achievements while opponents focus on perceived shortcomings. The Performance argument therefore reflects a wider struggle over public perception, governance priorities and the standards by which elected officials should be evaluated.
As Ekiti’s political conversation continues to evolve, voters will likely encounter more competing narratives about development, security and leadership. For now, Bejide’s remarks have succeeded in placing Performance and Governance at the centre of public discussion, ensuring that future debates will focus less on political personalities and more on whether citizens believe their everyday realities reflect meaningful progress. OGM News Nigeria will continue monitoring developments and providing updates as the story unfolds.
Table of Contents
Discover more from OGM News NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
