Nigeria’s political and judicial theatre has unveiled another gripping episode, with the African Democratic Congress (ADC) formally petitioning the National Judicial Council (NJC) against Justice Peter Lifu over the now-nullified judgement ordering the party’s deregistration. While the development is rooted in serious constitutional questions, the unfolding events have become the latest reminder that Nigerian politics often writes scripts that even seasoned dramatists might reject for being “too unbelievable.” OGM News NG understands that the petition has now shifted attention from party registration to judicial accountability.
Petition Sparks Fresh Debate Over Judicial Discipline
The ADC, through its National Legal Adviser, Professor Oserheimen Osunbor, accused Justice Peter Lifu of disregarding an earlier directive of the Court of Appeal to stay proceedings before delivering judgement. According to the party, such conduct undermines judicial hierarchy and weakens public confidence in the rule of law. The party insists that its petition to the NJC seeks accountability rather than political revenge.
In classic satirical fashion, political observers joked that Nigerian court files may soon require traffic wardens because legal orders appear to be overtaking one another on the judicial highway. Yet behind the humour lies a serious constitutional issue. The Court of Appeal recently ruled that the Federal High Court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the case and declared the deregistration order a nullity, restoring the legal status of the ADC and four other political parties.
Appeal Court Restores ADC And Other Parties as Political Chessboard Resets
The appellate court held that the suit brought by the National Forum of Former Legislators was incompetent because the group lacked the legal standing to institute the action. The court further criticised the trial court for proceeding despite an existing stay order, describing the action in unusually strong judicial language while reaffirming that lower courts are expected to comply with superior court directives.
Meanwhile, the satirical side of Nigeria’s political arena imagines the country’s legal system hosting a competition titled “Who Moved My Court Order?”—where every contestant claims to have read the memo but interpreted it differently. Fortunately for the affected parties, the Court of Appeal reset the political chessboard, allowing the ADC, Action Peoples Party, Action Alliance, Accord Party and Zenith Labour Party to retain their registration pending any further legal developments. The matter could still attract additional judicial attention if further appeals are pursued, although the ADC has expressed confidence that established legal principles on obedience to court orders will ultimately prevail.
As the legal contest shifts from the courtroom to the disciplinary process, OGM News NG will continue monitoring developments surrounding the NJC petition, any possible responses from the judiciary, and whether the matter proceeds to further judicial review. For now, the episode serves as another reminder that in Nigeria’s democracy, courtrooms can sometimes become as politically captivating as campaign
Table of Contents
Discover more from OGM News NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
