In response to Peter Obi’s recent world press conference, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s team has reaffirmed the legitimacy of the Supreme Court’s judgment, which upheld Tinubu’s electoral victory. The Supreme Court dismissed Obi’s appeal, and in his statement, Obi criticized the court for what he termed a “disturbing aversion to public opinion.” However, President Tinubu’s team highlights that the court’s decision was based on the law and evidence, not public sentiment.
Peter Obi’s Critique of Democratic Institutions: Obi’s Disconnect from Reality
During his press conference, Peter Obi heavily criticized democratic institutions, particularly the judiciary, for not awarding him victory in the election. President Tinubu’s team points out that Obi’s critique appears to be rooted in a sense of entitlement rather than a genuine concern for the democratic process. They argue that cases should be decided based on evidence and the law, not public opinion, and that Obi failed to meet these criteria.
Obi’s inability to distinguish between his version of public opinion and reality has been a central issue throughout the election season, according to President Tinubu’s team. They suggest that Obi seemed to be influenced by the vocal support of his netizens and fringe supporters, which led him to create an alternate reality where he believed he had won the election. President Tinubu’s team argues that such a disconnect from reality is not conducive to constructive political discourse.
President Tinubu’s team Call for Mature and Constructive Opposition
Peter Obi’s past experiences with the Supreme Court were also brought up in President Tinubu’s team’s response. They note that when the court’s decisions favored Obi, he praised the judiciary as beacons of democracy. However, now that the court’s rulings are against him, he accuses the courts of betraying democracy. President Tinubu’s team stresses that the focus should always be on the country and not on individual interests, and that court cases are determined by evidence and the law.
Peter Obi Proposes Five-Year Presidential
Peter Obi has earlier unveiled a proposal for a five-year presidential tenure for each of the six geopolitical zones in Nigeria. This idea challenges the status quo, as it diverges from the six-year tenure concept advanced by Atiku Abubakar, instead advocating for a shorter term accompanied by a 30-year rotational system.
President Tinubu’s team welcomes Peter Obi‘s decision to engage in opposition politics. They encourage Obi and his Labour Party to do so maturely and constructively, emphasizing the importance of contributing to the task of building a safer, stronger, and more prosperous country for all citizens. This response underscores the need for a focus on national interests and adherence to legal processes in the democratic system, rather than personal opinions and entitlement.
Table of Contents
Discover more from OGM News NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
