President Tinubu Honored as “Otuekong” by Akwa Ibom Traditional Rulers

The Council of Traditional Rulers in Akwa Ibom State has conferred the title of “Otuekong” on President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. The title, which translates to “Commander-in-Chief of Akwa Ibom State,” is one of the highest honors given by the state’s traditional institutions.

This recognition underscores Tinubu’s growing influence in the South-South region, traditionally a stronghold of opposition politics. While his supporters hail the honor as a testament to his leadership, critics question whether such a title blurs the lines between political authority and traditional institutions.

Political Implications and Regional Dynamics

Akwa Ibom has long been a stronghold of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), making this recognition of a sitting All Progressives Congress (APC) president highly symbolic. Some political analysts see this as a strategic move to strengthen Tinubu’s influence in the region ahead of future elections.

However, opposition voices argue that traditional institutions should remain apolitical. They express concerns that bestowing such a title on a partisan figure could alienate sections of the populace and erode the neutrality of the revered council.

The Traditional Council’s Justification

The traditional rulers have defended their decision, citing Tinubu’s contributions to national development and his commitment to fostering unity. They argue that his economic and infrastructural policies have positively impacted Akwa Ibom, warranting the prestigious honor.

The council also emphasized that past leaders from various political backgrounds have been similarly recognized, insisting that the title is not an endorsement of any political agenda but a mark of respect for leadership and service.

Backlash and Public Reaction

The announcement has elicited mixed reactions from citizens, with some celebrating the recognition and others questioning its timing and implications. While some residents see it as a deserved honor, others believe it could be a calculated political maneuver ahead of the next electoral cycle.

Social media platforms have been flooded with contrasting opinions, with hashtags both in support and against the title trending. Many argue that traditional rulers should focus on cultural preservation rather than political alignment.

Legal and Constitutional Considerations

Legal experts are now debating whether such a title holds any constitutional weight or if it is purely ceremonial. Some argue that conferring a title implying military authority—such as “Commander-in-Chief”—on a civilian leader at the state level could set a concerning precedent.

Others, however, dismiss these concerns, stating that traditional titles are largely symbolic and do not interfere with the president’s official powers. The debate raises important questions about the intersection of traditional leadership and modern governance in Nigeria.

What This Means for Tinubu’s Legacy

This honor adds another layer to Tinubu’s political legacy, potentially cementing his influence in a region that has historically been resistant to his party. If leveraged strategically, it could bolster his administration’s standing in the South-South.

However, the controversy surrounding the title underscores the deep political divisions in the country. Whether this move strengthens Tinubu’s political capital or fuels further polarization remains to be seen.