Peter Obi Threatens N5bn Defamation Suit Over Protest Allegations

Peter Obi, the Labour Party (LP) presidential candidate in the 2023 elections, has issued a 72-hour ultimatum to Bayo Onanuga, the special adviser to President Bola Tinubu on information and strategy. Obi demands that Onanuga retract his allegedly defamatory statement, which accuses Obi and his supporters of being behind a proposed nationwide protest against economic hardship. In a letter from Obi’s lawyer, Alex Ejesieme (SAN), the former governor of Anambra State also requires Onanuga to publish a public apology in four national newspapers, including Vanguard, THISDAY, Punch, and Onanuga’s verified X account (@aonanuga1956).

The letter describes Onanuga’s allegations as “widespread defamation and libel” that have severely tarnished Obi’s reputation. Peter Obi asserts that these claims, which gained traction on social and mainstream media, misrepresent him as a promoter of violence, damaging his image as a peaceful leader. To address the emotional and reputational harm caused, Peter Obi is demanding N5 billion in damages from Onanuga.

The Allegations and Planned Protest

The controversy stems from Onanuga’s statements accusing Obi’s supporters of planning a nationwide protest against the rising cost of living and economic hardship, set to occur from August 1 to 15. Onanuga further alleged that the organizers of this protest are the same individuals who “hijacked” the #ENDSARS protest in 2020, which addressed police brutality in Nigeria.

In a post on X, Onanuga wrote, “Obi should be held responsible for anarchy. Don’t be fooled: the malcontents planning to stage nationwide protests are supporters of Peter Obi, the failed presidential candidate of the Labour Party. And he should be held responsible for whatever crisis emanates from the action.” This statement has been widely disseminated and read by many both within and outside Nigeria, exacerbating the situation for Obi.

Peter Obi’s Response and Legal Threat

Peter Obi’s response to the allegations emphasizes the damage done to his reputation, both personally and professionally. His lawyer’s letter states, “It’s our client’s conviction that the publication was a calculated plot to demean, ridicule, humiliate, and embarrass him by the estimation of every right-thinking member of society.” The letter highlights that despite Obi’s esteemed reputation, the defamatory publication has caused him significant emotional distress.

Obi, known by his moniker ‘Okwute’ (the Rock), insists on the retraction of Onanuga’s statements and an apology within 72 hours. Failure to meet these demands will compel Obi to take legal action against Onanuga for defamation and libel. The case underscores the high stakes of political discourse in Nigeria and the potential legal ramifications of public statements made by influential figures. ::Bayo Onanuga Responds to Legal Threat from Peter Obi’s Lawyer

Bayo Onanuga, a prominent media personality and aide to President Tinubu, has reacted defiantly to the legal threat posed by Peter Obi’s lawyer. The lawyer has reportedly threatened to file a N5 billion lawsuit against Onanuga and demanded a public apology over comments made regarding a planned ‘revolution.’ Onanuga, however, remains unperturbed by these legal threats.

In a recent statement, Onanuga stated, “Let me just tell Peter Obi and his lawyer: I am not afraid of any legal action. We shall meet in court.” This bold declaration underscores his readiness to face the impending legal battle. Onanuga’s response suggests that he is confident in his position and unyielding in the face of what he perceives as an intimidation tactic.

Implications of the Legal Threat for Both Parties

The potential lawsuit from Peter Obi’s camp could have significant implications for both parties involved. For Peter Obi, a former vice-presidential candidate and influential political figure, the lawsuit represents a serious attempt to defend his reputation and counter what he views as defamatory statements. Obi’s lawyer’s demand for an apology and substantial financial compensation indicates the gravity with which they regard Onanuga’s remarks.

Onanuga, on the other hand, seems prepared to engage in a legal confrontation. His dismissive stance towards the lawsuit reflects a belief in the strength of his legal position or a strategic decision to fight the battle in the public arena. The case, if it proceeds, will likely attract considerable media attention, further spotlighting the ongoing tensions between the two high-profile figures.

By choosing to confront the lawsuit head-on, Onanuga is not only defending his statements but also challenging the broader implications of legal actions in political discourse. The outcome of this potential court case could set a precedent for how similar disputes are handled in the future, making it a pivotal moment in the intersection of media, law, and politics in Nigeria.