The Presidency, in a recent interview, placed the responsibility for the current state of Nigeria’s Democracy squarely on former President Olusegun . According to Bayo Onanuga, the Special Adviser to the President on Information and Strategy, Obasanjo played a pivotal role in introducing the current democratic model during his leadership as both military Head of State (1976–1979) and civilian President (1999–2007). Onanuga expressed that Obasanjo’s criticism of the democratic system appears contradictory, considering his historical involvement in its adoption and practice.
The adviser highlighted Obasanjo’s call for an “Afro democracy,” emphasizing the need for a system tailored to Africa’s unique needs. However, the Presidency countered by asserting that if former President Olusegun genuinely believes in reform, he should advocate for a return to the parliamentary system, which the British left for Nigeria before the military interruption in 1966.
Obasanjo Criticizes Western Democracy
Former President Obasanjo’s recent critique of Western democracy, claiming it has not delivered good governance and development in Africa, adds another layer to the ongoing discourse. former President Olusegun proposed an “Afro democracy,” arguing that the Western model neglects African history and multicultural complexities, leading to a government that does not fully represent all the people. He highlighted the weakness of liberal democracy, especially in its failure to address the welfare and well-being of the entire population.
In response, the Presidency questioned Obasanjo’s inconsistency, pointing out that he failed to advocate for a better system during his tenure. Onanuga specifically criticized former President Olusegun for accepting the American-style presidential democracy recommended by the constitutional assembly in 1999, deviating from the parliamentary system practiced before the military intervention.
