Kemi Nanna Nandap’s Tenure Extension Marks the Beginning of Anarchy in NIS, President Tinubu Defies Bureaucracy

Kemi Nanna Nandap has received an extension of her tenure as the Comptroller-General of the Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, prolonging her leadership until December 31, 2026. This decision extends her time in office beyond the initial term, which was set to conclude on August 31, 2025.

Kemi Nanna Nandap’s tenure extension has sparked a wave of reactions from various quarters, with some stakeholders lauding the decision as a step toward continuity, while others question the legality and fairness of the move. Given the regulatory framework governing Nigeria’s paramilitary agencies, concerns about institutional precedents have emerged.

A Decorated Career in Immigration Administration

Kemi Nanna Nandap joined the NIS on October 9, 1989, dedicating over three decades to service in immigration management. Her rise through the ranks culminated in her appointment as Comptroller-General on March 1, 2024, where she quickly embarked on an ambitious reform agenda.

Kemi Nanna Nandap’s leadership has been marked by the digitization of passport processing, enhanced border surveillance, and proactive policies aimed at curbing illegal migration. Supporters argue that these achievements justify the extension, positioning her as an invaluable asset to the agency.

Policy Implications and Institutional Disruptions

Kemi Nanna Nandap’s extension has raised critical questions regarding institutional governance. According to the Unified Conditions of Service for Nigeria’s paramilitary agencies, officials are expected to retire after 35 years of service or upon reaching 60 years of age.

Kemi Nanna Nandap joined in 1989, meaning her retirement was originally expected in October 2024. Critics argue that extending her tenure disrupts the established succession plan within the NIS and undermines opportunities for other high-ranking officers waiting in line for promotion.

Ministerial Directives and Government Stance

Kemi Nanna Nandap’s appointment initially came with clear directives from the Minister of Interior, Dr. Olubunmi Tunji-Ojo, who emphasized the importance of performance-driven leadership. He stated unequivocally that no excuses for underperformance would be tolerated, underscoring the administration’s intent to drive efficiency in the NIS.

Kemi Nanna Nandap’s extension suggests that the presidency has confidence in her ability to continue spearheading immigration reforms. However, it also places significant pressure on her to deliver measurable results in curbing illegal migration, improving border security, and streamlining immigration processes.

Public Sentiment and Social Media Reactions

Kemi Nanna Nandap’s tenure extension has become a hot topic on social media, with divided opinions. On X (formerly Twitter), some Nigerians commend the decision, attributing it to the need for stability and experience in the agency. Others, however, view it as a disregard for meritocracy and an unfair retention of power.

Kemi Nanna Nandap’s name has also dominated discussions on forums like Nairaland and Facebook groups dedicated to civil service matters. While some officers within the NIS see this as a political decision that might affect morale, others believe that an experienced leader is necessary during a critical period of national security concerns.

Future Prospects for the Nigeria Immigration Service

Kemi Nanna Nandap, with her extended tenure now confirmed, faces both opportunities and obstacles in her continued leadership of the NIS. Key areas requiring immediate attention include the reduction of passport issuance delays, enhancement of biometric data collection, and fortification of Nigeria’s land and sea borders against transnational crimes.

Kemi Nanna Nandap’s extension, however, sets a controversial precedent that could influence future appointments within Nigeria’s paramilitary agencies. How this plays out within the ranks of the NIS and the broader public service will likely shape discussions on institutional governance for years to come.