The ongoing legal dispute between elder statesman Aare Afe Babalola and activist lawyer Dele Farotimi has escalated dramatically, with Babalola vehemently defending his reputation against what he claims are false and damaging allegations. At the center of the controversy is Farotimi’s book, “Nigeria and its Criminal Justice System,” which Afe Babalola alleges contains defamatory statements targeting his professional integrity and reputation. The senior advocate has taken decisive action, petitioning the police to investigate the claims and initiating legal proceedings to protect his hard-earned professional standing.
The case has drawn significant attention from legal circles and the public, highlighting the delicate balance between free speech and protection against character assassination. Babalola’s legal team, comprising experienced former Nigerian Bar Association leaders, argues that while free expression is crucial, it cannot be used as a shield for malicious and unsubstantiated claims that could potentially damage an individual’s reputation built over decades of professional excellence.
Police Intervention and Judicial Proceedings
Nigerian law enforcement has become directly involved in the dispute, with the Ekiti State Police taking swift action following Babalola’s petition. Farotimi was arrested in Lagos and subsequently arraigned before an Ekiti State Magistrates Court, demonstrating the serious nature of the allegations. The initial court proceedings resulted in Farotimi’s remand, with the matter adjourned until December 10, 2024, signaling the judicial system’s commitment to thoroughly examining the claims.
The legal strategy employed by Afe Babalola’s team is clear: challenge Farotimi to provide verifiable proof of his allegations or face prosecution for criminal defamation. Owoseni Ajayi, Babalola’s lead lawyer and former Attorney General, emphasized the importance of truth verification, challenging the public to seek facts before forming opinions about the case.
Expansion of Legal Charges
In a significant development, the police have escalated the legal action by filing fresh charges at the federal high court in Ado-Ekiti. These new allegations extend beyond the original defamation claims, focusing on cybercrime provisions. Specifically, the charges relate to an online interview Farotimi gave on the Mic On Podcast, where he allegedly made statements about Babalola corrupting the judiciary.
The cybercrime charges represent a sophisticated legal approach, leveraging Section 24(1)(b) of the Cybercrimes Act to address what the police characterize as the intentional transmission of false information designed to cause societal disruption. This expansion of charges demonstrates the complex legal landscape surrounding digital communication and its potential for causing reputational harm.
Afe Babalola Seeks Evidence or Justice
Aare Afe Babalola’s petition to the police outlined his demands: that Farotimi provide evidence to substantiate his allegations or face the legal consequences of criminal defamation under Nigerian law. The elder statesman also requested the confiscation of all defamatory materials related to the case until investigations are concluded.
Ajayi questioned whether seeking justice was unfair due to Babalola’s global stature. “Is it wrong for Aare Afe Babalola to seek justice for these false utterances against him? Should justice only be available to Mr. Dele Farotimi because Aare Afe Babalola is a global icon?” he asked. He further noted that the law protects free speech but not when it is used to harm someone’s reputation maliciously.
Police File Fresh Cybercrime Charges
In a new twist, the Ekiti State police filed additional charges against Farotimi at the Federal High Court in Ado Ekiti. The new charges stem from allegations made during an online interview on the Mic On Podcast hosted by Seun Okinbaloye. Farotimi had reportedly accused Babalola of corrupting the judiciary, an assertion described by the police as false and intended to incite public unrest.
The first count of the fresh charges read: “That you, Dele Farotimi ‘m,’ on 28th August 2024 knowingly and intentionally transmitted communication in an online interview on Mic On Podcast by Seun Okinbaloye on your YouTube channel… wherein you stated in the interview that: ‘Aare Afe Babalola corrupted the judiciary,’ which you know to be false information for the purpose of causing the breakdown of law and order, thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 24(1)(b) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act 2015 as amended.”
As the legal battle continues, all eyes remain on the courts to determine the outcome of this high-profile defamation case, which underscores the balance between free speech and protecting one’s reputation.
Table of Contents
Discover more from OGM News NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
