In a decisive move, the National Industrial Court of Nigeria has issued a restraining order against the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC), Trade Union Congress (TUC), and their affiliated unions, effectively banning the nationwide strike scheduled to commence on November 14. This legal intervention comes in response to an ex-parte application submitted by the Federal Government of Nigeria and the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice.
Legal Basis and Government‘s Plea: Court’s Ruling and Government’s Victory
President of the Court, Justice Benedict Bakwaph Kanyip, invoked sections 17 and 19 of the National Industrial Court Act to justify the issuance of the restraining order against the labour unions. The Federal Government, represented by their legal counsel, Tijani Gazali, argued that the proposed strike would impose untold hardships on law-abiding citizens and businesses, prompting the need for legal intervention to avert potential chaos.
Justice Kanyip, in a concise yet impactful ruling, expressed the court’s authority to intervene through a restraining order to maintain peace and tranquility. The judge not only granted all the requests presented by the federal government in the ex-parte application but also directed the physical posting of the restraining order on the wall of the Labour House, the last known address of the two defendants. This move serves as a symbolic gesture, ensuring the labour unions are made aware of the court’s position.
Notice by Publication and Future Implications
Furthermore, the court mandated that the restraining order, along with the originating and other legal processes, be published in two major national dailies. This strategic dissemination aims to reach a broader audience, raising awareness among the public and stakeholders about the legal constraints on the planned strike. As the nation awaits the response of the labour unions, the restraining order sets a precedent for the delicate balance between the right to strike and the necessity of maintaining societal order.
This legal development marks a crucial chapter in the ongoing dialogue between the government and labour unions, underscoring the intricate dynamics of industrial relations in Nigeria. As the implications of this court order ripple through the nation, it remains to be seen how both parties will navigate this legal terrain and whether alternative avenues for dispute resolution will be explored
Court Intervenes as NLC and TUC‘ Nationwide Strike Looms
Court Intervention comes at the back of the joint declaration of a nationwide strike by the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress (TUC). The strike, scheduled to commence on November 14, 2023, has stirred widespread concern and debate across the nation, with its roots firmly embedded in a shocking incident that has left the country in a state of disbelief.
The trigger for this industrial action is the reported brutalization of NLC National President, Joe Ajaero, in Imo State just last week. The incident has sent shockwaves throughout the nation, prompting the NLC and TUC to unite in a call for a nationwide strike to protest against what they perceive as an attack on workers’ rights and their leadership.
However, the decision to launch this massive industrial action has not been without controversy. Critics argue that NLC President Joe Ajaero has been displaying partisan tendencies, pointing to a recent social media post that has fueled suspicions regarding his political affiliations. The post, originally shared by David Offor and retweeted by Bayo Onanuga, features a picture showing Joe Ajaero in a handshake with Imo state Labour Party’s Gubernatorial candidate, Athan Achuonu.
The social media post has sparked a wave of speculation, with some suggesting that Ajaero’s involvement in Imo state politics runs deeper than his role as a labor leader. The controversy surrounding this revelation has led to widespread criticism of the NLC president, with detractors arguing that his political affiliations compromise the impartiality of the labor movement.
As the nation grapples with these developments, the judiciary has deemed it necessary to intervene. The court’s decision to step in adds another layer of complexity to an already contentious situation. Observers are keenly watching to see how the legal proceedings unfold and what impact they may have on the proposed nationwide strike.
The NLC and TUC, on the other hand, remain resolute in their stance, insisting that the nationwide strike is a necessary response to the alleged brutalization of their leader and an affirmation of their commitment to protecting workers’ rights. As the nation braces for a potential disruption, the coming days will likely bring further revelations and developments in this unfolding saga.
Table of Contents
Discover more from OGM News NG
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
